-
(submitted by GirlsLoveCams)
-
(from ridiculouslybeautiful via ladzh-blog)
Good Morning! by Roman Piasetskiy
- (from seeksthenight via seeksthenight)
-
(from olderoticart via olderoticart)
HAHAHA Totally not sexist AT ALL ^^
- (from lesbianwomen-deactivated2014101 via ladzh-blog)
- (from freelovemoney via theroosterrecycles)
- (from vikkiblowsaday via vikkiblowsaday)
-
livingartist-blog-blog asked: I find it disappointing, to say the least, that a tumblr named "female shapes" seems to be devoted solely to young, white, able-bodied, cisgendered, conventionally pretty female shapes. That's an incredibly narrow slice of the glorious diversity within femininity.
I agree. Seriously. And it’s not the first time someone points out the poor diversity. (sizes, color, age…)
But you have to understand (I should write a disclaimer) that this blog is not a thorough representation of what women are, but a fantasy of mine, and Femaleshapes is just a name. It means I only reblog what I see on my dash that moves me. I totally plead guilty about the narrow slice of beauty, but you have to forgive me. They mostly are similar to my girlfriend. We are young, cisgendered, slim and able-bodied. And the fact is I reblog only what is published on my dash. About “white”, I searched for more diversified tumblrs, I asked my followers to give me links, but as it is now, I see more white women on my dash. I’d like that to change. (the irony is that we are a mixed couple)
I’m aware that my choices can make some women feel uncomfortable, like magazines do. But I decided to come to terms with that. I don’t think I should make quotas, or give up reblogging photos I find aesthetically moving.
Thank you for your comment. And yes, diversity IS glorious.
PS: you don’t have an “ask box” so I can’t contact you.
- (from passius via pinkprincess17)
- (from seeksthenight via seeksthenight)
-
(from fitorae-deactivated20120602 via oio)
Karlee O’Donnell
- (from stonedlocote via pinkprincess17)
- (from nsfworld via nsfworld)
- (from mirellamel-deactivated20120609 via oio)













